![]() 04/01/2018 at 19:33 • Filed to: Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk | ![]() | ![]() |
Looks like my mom’s neighbors got themselves a 707 HP Easter present.
![]() 04/01/2018 at 19:36 |
|
That NX tho...
![]() 04/01/2018 at 19:38 |
|
Gross. The NX we get here in the USA looks so derpy with that upturned bumper.
![]() 04/01/2018 at 19:40 |
|
Take caliente : From this angle, it actually kind of resembles a Jeep Compass on steelies.
Sad to say, but I can’t unsee it now.
![]() 04/01/2018 at 19:47 |
|
There is a resemblance. That said, I still like it - it isn’t overly shouty. To be honest, I’ve never thought the Journey is that bad looking... just need plain.
![]() 04/01/2018 at 19:53 |
|
Blame the government. In order to count as a light truck, the NX has to have approach angles within a certain range. The Euro market NX base model has the same flat lower bumper as the F Sport package NX in the US.
![]() 04/01/2018 at 20:05 |
|
aww ye
707hp Mazda 6
![]() 04/01/2018 at 22:57 |
|
Are you sure? I have a hard time believing that approach angles are a regulation requirement. If that was the case, the GX460 and the LX570 would both fail miserably. I think it’s more a marketing decision
![]() 04/01/2018 at 23:07 |
|
That is what the GM at my dealership said was why they had different base trim fascias in the US.
I will ask corporate to clarify when I get to work tomorrow.
![]() 04/01/2018 at 23:40 |
|
I was looking for a Pulsar NX and left disappointed...
![]() 04/02/2018 at 01:12 |
|
Yellow brakes look good. Now paint the rest of it yellow
![]() 04/02/2018 at 13:37 |
|
If such a thing existed from the factory I’d be making a very bad 7 year loan decision...
![]() 04/02/2018 at 13:39 |
|
Yeah that’s what I meant - the Euro one looks so much better. The question I have is why the NX needs the improved approach angle to qualify as a light truck but the RX somehow does it with the flat front.
![]() 04/02/2018 at 13:40 |
|
*Shrug* I have no idea. The US fuel economy rules really do not make much sense.
![]() 04/02/2018 at 14:36 |
|
The PT Cruiser was classified as a light truck. Different EPA and DOT Safety requirements.
![]() 04/02/2018 at 14:42 |
|
However, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which oversees compliance, has no specific definition for crossovers, so manufacturers essentially get to choose segments to fit them into.
These segments include “small,” “mid-size,” or “large” car, and “small” or “standard” SUV.
But the small SUV category is also split into “two-wheel drive” and “four-wheel drive” subcategories, with “two-wheel drive” models considered cars, and “four-wheel drive” models considered SUVs.
That means a model with multiple drivetrain options could be classified as both a car and a truck.
That’s the case with the Nissan Pathfinder which, with a GVWR of 5,985 pounds, comes in just under the 6,000-pound maximum weight for “small” SUVs.
So front-wheel drive versions of the Pathfinder are considered cars, while all-wheel drive versions are considered trucks, as far as the EPA is concerned.
![]() 04/02/2018 at 14:53 |
|
Because that makes total sense??? Sure, let’s allow car makers to choose how they classify their own cars, what could possibly go wrong?